Units / ATS2946
ATS2946 · Critical thinking: How to analyse arguments and improve your reasoning skills
2026 Handbook6 credit pointsLevel 2Philosophy
Last checked: 23 Aug 2026 UTCOverview
Critical thinking skills are useful in a wide variety of professions, including law, business, computer science, medicine, as well as in everyday life. What is the best way to construct, articulate and represent an argument? How can we overcome bias and prejudice in our decision-making, to think clearly and innovatively? ? Should we believe what our doctors, mechanics, or financial advisors tell us, just because they are experts in their fields? By addressing questions like these, we will examine several methods of effective reasoning. We will also examine the ways in which reasoning can go wrong. If you successfully complete the unit you will be able to evaluate evidence, critique arguments, and use these abilities in a wide variety of workplace and everyday situations. This unit will help you to develop the analytical skills needed to generate new ideas and innovative solutions in your professional and personal life.
Areas of study: Philosophy Journalism Professional Futures
Offerings
| Campus | Teaching period | Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Clayton | Summer semester A | A combination of on-campus and online teaching in a block period (FLX-BLK) |
| Clayton | First semester | Some activities have a choice of on-campus or online teaching activities (FLEXIBLE) |
| Clayton | Second semester | Some activities have a choice of on-campus or online teaching activities (FLEXIBLE) |
Assessment
The Handbook does not list a final examination among the assessment items. That is not a guarantee there is none.
| # | Assessment | Type | Weight | Hurdle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In-Class Participation Activity | Exercise | 10% | — |
| 2 | Reflective Writing Essay | Written | 20% | — |
| 3 | In-Class Participation Activity | Exercise | 10% | — |
| 4 | Analytical Exercise | Exercise | 30% | — |
| 5 | Take Home Final Assessment | Written | 30% | — |
Within semester assessment: 100%
Assessment details may change. Please refer to the assessment information in Moodle closer to the start of the teaching period.
Requisites
The Handbook lists no prerequisite, corequisite or prohibition for this unit.
Learning outcomes
- Identify and explain the theory of argument;
- Extract arguments from a variety of texts;
- Identify and represent the structure of an argument;
- Recognise and apply the criteria of argument success;
- Evaluate common types of argument;
- Construct an argument of your own.
Workload
Minimum total expected workload to achieve the learning outcomes for this unit is 144 hours per semester typically comprising a mixture of scheduled learning activities and independent study. Scheduled activities may include a combination of teacher directed learning, peer directed learning and online engagement.
| Activity | Duration |
|---|---|
| Tutorials | 24 hours |
| Lectures | 12 hours |
Ask about ATS2946
Answered from the Handbook fields above — no AI, no guessing. Every answer links back to the source.
Community discussions about ATS2946
CommunityStudent experience, not official rules. Nothing here changes what the Handbook says.