LAW5056 · Jessup moot competition

Overview

Examination of current issues in Public International Law, with the scenario usually based, in part, upon a contemporary issue or problem in global governance. The focus is on oral advocacy, research skills, strategic thinking and team work. The subject culminates in a national mooting competition in Canberra, with the two finalist teams advancing to the international competition in Washington, D.C.

Offerings

Assessment

The Handbook does not list a final examination among the assessment items. That is not a guarantee there is none.

Assessment details may change. Please refer to the assessment information in Moodle closer to the start of the teaching period.

Requisites

Learning outcomes

1. Prepare legal arguments by applying an intellectual and practical synthesis of: a thorough understanding of law relevant to complex international disputes; firm grasp of a complex factual scenario; and an appreciation of policy and principles behind development of the law including Human Rights; a thorough understanding of contemporary developments in international law and its professional practice.
2. Identify and apply legal reasoning and research to generate appropriate and persuasive argument and to develop and articulate complex legal issues; apply, engage in critical analysis and make strategic choices distinguish between different approaches in comparative law; assess strengths and weaknesses in legal argument from strategic and substantive perspectives; have a developing ability to exercise professional judgment; and demonstrate sophisticated cognitive and creative skills in approaching difficult legal issues and generating appropriate responses.
3. Demonstrate the intellectual and practical skills needed to justify and interpret theoretical propositions, legal methodologies, conclusions and professional decisions, as well as to identify, research, evaluate and synthesise relevant factual, legal and policy issues, including a demonstrated ability to locate, isolate and thoroughly understand appropriate materials such as cases, scholarship, uniform texts and other instruments for use in the World Court in The Hague.
4. Reflect upon and recognise ways to articulate persuasively in light of personal abilities, exercise a high degree of professional and practical judgement to predict likely arguments of opponents and techniques in responding to these and to queries from an audience of a panel of experts with varied legal and professional backgrounds, and to collaborate effectively within a team to produce individual and group outcomes that maximize strengths.
5. Learn and work with a high level of individual autonomy, responsibility, and professionalism, reflect on and assess their own capabilities and performance, and make use of feedback to accelerate personal and professional development.

Workload

The unit requires a higher workload commitment than other units, approximately 150 hours as is required for a 6 credit point unit, during November to February. All students are required to attend an interview, during which the workload requirements are further explained.

Student experience, not official rules. Nothing here changes what the Handbook says.